8 video-sharing sites compared
Posted on | November 28, 2006 |
Life Goggles has published a comparison of eigth popular video-sharing sites, including YouTube, Google Video, metacafe, soapbox, Revver (as far as I know the only one sharing revenue with content-producers), Blip.tv and others (click for part one & two of the review, or jump to the sample-clips for comfortable vice-versa quality comparison). while all sites are quite easy to use, the resulting video quality varys significantly - Life Goggles found metacafe’s and Microsoft’s soapbox’ encoders working best, but see yourself.
Tags: video
Comments
One Response to “8 video-sharing sites compared”
Leave a Reply
December 15th, 2006 @ 11:34 am
Hi Michael,
Thanks for posting a link to my site, I thought you might like to know that the sample clips page you linked to now has 25 different video sharing sites on it. I’ve also recently posted a matrix comparing their features http://www.lifegoggles.com/?p=233 (which will appear in more detail in my eBook). If there is anything else you think it’s worth including then please let me know, there’s a wealth of choice out there at the moment. Many thanks.